THE 8TH ANNUAL ADVOCACY CONFERENCE - APRIL 23RD 2008At the conclusion of a personal injury claim issues often arise with respect to the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP). There can be an issue as to whether or not ODSP is entitled to reimbursement. There can also be an issue with respect to whether the client is entitled to continue to receive ODSP.
Generally, the settlement or judgement is income in the month that it is received and is an asset thereafter.
Payments for lost income, for income replacement benefits and disability benefits are income. For the months they are received, they will disentitle the client to ODSP and ODSP will have a right of subrogation to the lost income for the period of time that it was paid.
Payments for pain and suffering, prejudgement interest on pain and suffering, and payments for expenses actually and reasonably incurred or to be incurred as a result of the injury or death are exempt from income up to $100,000.00.
The appropriate sections of the Regulation are Ontario Regulation 222/98, sections
The recent case of Mule v. The Director of Ontario Disability Support Program et al., Court File No.: DC-06-365 (Divisional Court), held that interest on general damages for pain and suffering constitutes exempt income.
With respect to assets, a person in receipt of ODSP may not have assets greater than $5,000.00 and still receive ODSP (s. 27(1) of O. Reg. 222/98).
Section 28 of the Regulations list assets that are exempt from the $5,000.00 limit. The list of exempt assets include damages or compensation for pain and suffering, expenses actually and reasonably incurred as a result of injury or death and compensation under the Family Law Act for loss of guidance, care and companionship.
Pursuant to the Mule case, prejudgement interest on these damages would also be exempt.
The maximum amount of the exemption for assets is $100,000.00. This is under s. 28(2) of the Regulations.
The appropriate sections are,
Both with respect to income and assets, the Director has discretion to increase that $100,000.00 cap. The Director also has discretion to increase the $5,000.00 cap on non-exempt assets.
Asking the Director to exercise his or her discretion to increase the caps on income and assets can be of benefit to your client as it may permit your client to obtain the settlement and remain on ODSP. It may also have implications with respect to the amount of ODSP’s subrogated claim.
The Director can increase the cap over $100,000.00 if the amount represents money paid with respect to expenses actually and reasonably incurred or to be incurred, or if the money is to be used with respect to injury or disability.
The $5,000.00 cap can be increased if the asset is to be used to purchase an item or service the Director considers necessary for the health of the client or for disability related items or services as approved by the Director.
In order to get the Director to exercise his discretion, you need to write to him or her. The letter should be addressed to Legal Services Branch, Ministry of the Attorney General, 17th Floor, 56 Wellesley Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M7A 1E9.
In the letter, include the following:
It is also vital that you contact ODSP prior to setting up a plan and certainly prior to the disbursal of any funds. Generally, I would call first and speak to somebody before sending the letter.
It would be extremely foolhardy not to get approval of a plan by ODSP prior to putting that plan in place.
In most cases where there have been insufficient funds to pay for the cost of future care, the Director is likely to exercise discretion and increase the maximums.